|
|
To meet the demand for natural-looking hairlines, doctors began decreasing
the size of grafts in the 1980s. Smaller grafts had the advantage of being
less visible during the transition period after transplantation and before
the hair had grown in. Large grafts placed in a frontal hairline look
pluggy and unnatural when the hair was combed back or to the side. The
patient in this situation was forced to comb his hair forward and down
to hide his hairline. When large grafts are placed behind the hairline
or in the crown, they tend to look like intermittent clumps of hair and
are very difficult to disguise.
The amount of time and work needed to place a large number of tiny grafts
is much greater than the time and work needed to place a smaller number
of larger grafts. Smaller grafts also produce a thinner (but more natural)
appearance. If the restoration process is stopped before completion, the
patient will still look natural. Larger grafts tend to obligate the patient
to complete multiple sessions in the quest for natural-looking results
and the patient's appearance can be strikingly unnatural before the work
is completed. Even with additional work, the large graft transplants often
fail to appear natural because they are intrinsically clumpy. On close
inspection, it is literally impossible for large graft transplants to
look and feel natural, even after the best work.
Patients should discuss the size of the grafts and the planned distribution
of the grafts in detail with their surgeons. Some surgeons use larger
grafts for the bulk of the work and then use smaller grafts in an attempt
to hide the larger grafts. Others only transplant small grafts. Some hair
transplant surgeons invent unusual terms for grafts in an attempt to make
it appear that they have some special, unique knowledge or technique.
These terms are intended to imply special variations in graft sizes or
an invisible appearance of the grafts. Do not be confused by arcane terminology.
The potential patient should be wary when a doctor claims to have a unique
technology or technique that no other doctor knows about or uses, unless
it is documented and published in a peer-reviewed medical journal. |
|
Hair Loss information
on this site has been contributed by hair loss specialists
and surgeons who have years of experience in the field of hair
loss.
|
Special Thanks To:
Dr Bill Rassman and Dr Bob Bernstein, who
contributed portions of their "Patients Guide to Hair Transplantation"
for use on this site. You can visit their excellent in-depth web
site at www.newhair.com
and request a full free copy of this, 300 page plus, book.
|
|
|